| Title |
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006968.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Blánaid Jm Daly, Mohammad O Sharif, Kate Jones, Helen V Worthington, Anna Beattie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 55 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,843,571
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,826
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,238
of 438,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.