| Title |
House modifications for preventing malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013398.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tilly Fox, Joanna Furnival-Adams, Marty Chaplin, Mark Napier, Evelyn A Olanga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Belgium | 3 | 8% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 6% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 45 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Design | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#710,867
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,308
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,984
of 442,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.