↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topically applied anaesthetics for treating perineal pain after childbirth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Topically applied anaesthetics for treating perineal pain after childbirth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004223.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hedyeh Hedayati, Jacqueline Parsons, Caroline A Crowther

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 168 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Other 21 12%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 54 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 21%
Psychology 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 61 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,514
of 69,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.