↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003142.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy Farquhar, Jane Marjoribanks, Russell Basser, Sarah E Hetrick, Anne Lethaby

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 23 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#9,922,541
of 18,083,481 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,246
of 11,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,016
of 246,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,083,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.