| Title |
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003142.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cindy Farquhar, Jane Marjoribanks, Russell Basser, Sarah E Hetrick, Anne Lethaby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,642,442
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,175
of 12,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,147
of 57,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.