↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical therapy interventions for pelvic girdle pain (PGP) after pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Physical therapy interventions for pelvic girdle pain (PGP) after pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012441
Authors

Gunvor Hilde, Annelie Gutke, Susan C Slade, Britt Stuge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 24%
Psychology 8 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 38 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,252,944
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,998
of 12,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,075
of 270,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.