| Title |
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001230.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wayne D Johnson, Rafael M. Diaz, William D Flanders, Michael Goodman, Andrew N Hill, David Holtgrave, Robert Malow, William M McClellan |
| Abstract |
Men who have sex with men (MSM) remain at great risk for HIV infection. Program planners and policy makers need descriptions of interventions and quantitative estimates of intervention effects to make informed decisions concerning prevention funding and research. The number of intervention strategies for MSM that have been examined with strong research designs has increased substantially in the past few years. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 584 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 562 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 109 | 19% |
| Researcher | 93 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 125 | 21% |
| Unknown | 85 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 195 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 97 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 11% |
| Psychology | 55 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 7% |
| Unknown | 106 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#984,934
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,951
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,037
of 96,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.