↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
461 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby Gosden, Frode Forland, Ivar Kristiansen, Matthew Sutton, Brenda Leese, Antonio Giuffrida, Michelle Sergison, Lone Pedersen

Abstract

It is widely believed that the method of payment of physicians may affect their clinical behaviour. Although payment systems may be used to achieve policy objectives (e.g. cost containment or improved quality of care), little is known about the effects of different payment systems in achieving these objectives.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 441 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 118 26%
Researcher 71 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 11%
Student > Bachelor 46 10%
Other 28 6%
Other 75 16%
Unknown 70 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 33%
Social Sciences 57 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 34 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 25 5%
Other 57 12%
Unknown 91 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#925,574
of 21,939,621 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,063
of 12,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,840
of 176,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,939,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.