| Title |
Cranberries for treating urinary tract infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001322 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth G Jepson, Lara Mihaljevic, Jonathan C Craig |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Chile | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 25% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#237,188
of 24,505,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#393
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51
of 36,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,505,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them