↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for vocal cord nodules

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for vocal cord nodules
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001934.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mette Pedersen, Julian McGlashan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 29 24%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Unspecified 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 33 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,492,173
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,970
of 12,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,353
of 167,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.