↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for vocal cord nodules

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for vocal cord nodules
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001934.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mette Pedersen, Julian McGlashan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 7 7%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 24 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,639,773
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,070
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,411
of 367,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.