↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for vocal cord nodules

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for vocal cord nodules
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001934.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mette Pedersen, Julian McGlashan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 53 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Linguistics 5 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 58 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,011
of 181,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.