| Title |
Vaccines for preventing cholera: killed whole cell or other subunit vaccines (injected)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000974.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia M Graves, Jonathan J Deeks, Vittorio Demicheli, Tom Jefferson |
| Abstract |
Injected cholera vaccines are rarely used today, although they may have some benefit. It is valuable to summarize the evidence for effectiveness of injected cholera vaccines for comparison with newer oral vaccines (subject of a separate Cochrane Review). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2023.
All research outputs
#663,546
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,223
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,721
of 104,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.