↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating functional dysphonia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Interventions for treating functional dysphonia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006373.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jani H Ruotsalainen, Jaana Sellman, Laura Lehto, Merja Jauhiainen, Jos H Verbeek

Abstract

Poor voice quality due to functional dysphonia can lead to a reduced quality of life. In occupations where voice use is substantial it can lead to a loss of employment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 25%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Psychology 15 7%
Linguistics 10 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 49 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,750,460
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,376
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,780
of 124,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.