↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Grimes, David Hubacher, Laureen M Lopez, Kenneth F Schulz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 39%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 27 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#10,958,921
of 18,187,474 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,775
of 11,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,648
of 401,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,187,474 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.