The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with asthma: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013799.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuji Oba, Sumayya Anwer, Tinashe Maduke, Tarang Patel, Sofia Dias |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 53 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 56 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,028,518
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,150
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,102
of 499,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.