@NateWeymouth @thereal_truther @Will31415926531 @TheChiefNerd @iXeno Re: "I think for myself" That is the same thing non-expert science denialists (especially pseudoskeptics) often say, whether they be flat Earthers, HIV/AIDS denialists, vaccine denialist
@NateWeymouth @thereal_truther @Will31415926531 @TheChiefNerd For instance, the tweet below is a textbook instance of non-expert vaccine denialism that is immune to rational consideration of evidence. https://t.co/UVAAEHvWrI https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https
@Overfakenews @gorskon @Debunk_the_Funk @weldeiry @ImmunoGangsta @DravenS17 @Jikkyleaks @P_J_Buckhaults Some people watch grown men kick a ball into a net. I play video games. If whining about people's hobbies is the best you got, then you should probably
@NateWeymouth @thereal_truther @Will31415926531 @TheChiefNerd You're a willfully ignorant + disingenuous charlatan, and I'm not going to pretend otherwise. You don't deserve to be taken seriously. https://t.co/zC1iRbHXof https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://
In più tutti gli studi fatti a riguardo dimostrano un profilo rischio beneficio fortemente a favore del vaccino. https://t.co/ah4PSwl2wo Anche su questo è ovviamente presente un'analisi sistematica della Cochrane Library https://t.co/diat2vvSc9 https://t.c
@bigger_bread @hage8675309 @KenPodrasky @YourBro91760395 @in_the_sky34221 @notabrokenthing @BeccaRocks7399 @EternalLifePlan @BryanKemper Since pubmed is a reliable source, I guess you agree that the COVID vaccine was vital in fighting Covid? https://t.co/D
@MemeWally @RenkaBlanche Une meta analyse de RCT datant de 2022. Apres tu vas pas avoir tous les 6 mois des RCT nouvelles sur ces vaccins. Faut pas deconner. https://t.co/5WFClxURcw
@K0DK0DK0D @jhan2qt @19joho @GidMK @drbogash Re: "The reason so much skepticism has been created about CV vaccine" ...is because ideologically-motivated non-expert vaccine denialists like you fabricate about it, just as occurred previously for garbage cla
@FreeMIN24465256 @matthieugarby @randomuser98752 @arikouts @MonerpMon347390 @raoult_didier Au choix : https://t.co/f0PalrVIKx (meta-review pour enfants et adolescents) https://t.co/C5Cgt3UjyV (Cochrae review - un peu datée) https://t.co/efpsIEcPEP (récent
@LaguerieMathias @Super_Fishman @2_expat L.O.L. "Je sais pas donc ça n'existe pas.". https://t.co/j9g5ShW1OI
@D1I7O @Tipuncho @SupernovaT423 @LoLoLamu Ah si il y a plein d'arguments https://t.co/eaFMmqnEJj
@MajaSeelen @HansLandman @KwekkieLentebol Nee, ik doel op gerenommeerde wetenschappers van gerenommeerde instituten die op gerenommeerde sites publiceren en wat door andere gerenommeerde wetenschappers wordt gereviewed, zoals dit artikel: https://t.co/9wIj
Who can poke the most holes in this condom analogy?
@StillShakinIt @EpiEllie Vaccines “prevent” illness in the same way condoms do: they don’t work all the time (nothing does), but they work much better than doing nothing. One of many reviews: https://t.co/mqmq5P6D6X
@ILGUARDIANOZ @ScaltritiLab Non basta questo per dire che si, i vaccini sono sicuri? https://t.co/diat2vvSc9
@MariuszJagora @Pawe19745344 https://t.co/4qEn6e28N5 https://t.co/jtBCNsKBbQ https://t.co/8C44RMEbrB ( tu masz coś o dzieciach) https://t.co/nBhAmd3nY8)%20in
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か? https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ
@jrseihgstein @CyberCoffeIT @GValeau @carlito50089599 @Oliviersanstom @MartinZ_uncut Toujours selon cochrane, sur les vaccins. https://t.co/rtIrwufihM
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か? https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ
RT @fhljpt: COVID-19ワクチンを有効とする 2021年11月時点(約2年前)でのコクランレビューです データ解析によるエビデンスはリアルワールドより常に遅れます
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か? https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か? https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か? https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ
COVID-19ワクチンを有効とする 2021年11月時点(約2年前)でのコクランレビューです データ解析によるエビデンスはリアルワールドより常に遅れます
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か? https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ
これが真🙄
COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か? https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ
@Elizabe28992182 @DoctoraPrego @miltommy56 No, los han engañado. 100% estudios adhoc afirman seguridad muy alta, similar otros fármacos Ej estudios masivos -Lancet, 280 millones adultos https://t.co/ezyAB0fR40 -JAMA, 11 mill NIÑOS https://t.co/1buJuaSx
@elenazorro76 @piliani_zaolo @m_ccini @Doctor_Gio_2 @LaBombetta76 @giusbrindisi @robygt77 https://t.co/RAp1ATlDxG Tra gli eventi neurologici descritti NON c'è la disautonomia https://t.co/0A8jDQQppe https://t.co/0UATnW3GOA
@peter_tornquist @CarlMattis1 @svtnyheter En av många redovisningar: https://t.co/QKZK1wVFMc
@MatthewWielicki I think it still is the gold standard and for COVID. They just messed up the one study. Here is their statement: https://t.co/KbnFBbB69c Here are two others. https://t.co/WinAiLpWDe https://t.co/Gk7qYBXIpG
@alexjonesSatire @zeusireog 1. No vaccine can stop 100% of any disease. 2. The vaccinated were catching COVID at a lower rate, and suffering milder symptoms. https://t.co/GIViRCWcbb
@franckpati77853 @salitribule Super 👍🏻 vous êtes au courant que dans l’expérimentation de cette thérapie génique à échelle mondiale il y avait des placebos ? 😬 https://t.co/cFiIebSK8o https://t.co/9eR5c0WSsx
@RobertM72103719 @FakeDoctorReal1 @Volksverpetzer Na klar doch, kommt auch noch was mit Substanz oder kannst du nur Copy-and-Paste? Peinlicher kann es für Dich schon garnicht mehr werden.🤦♂️ Hier ist was für Dich...👇 https://t.co/FvrtOpgXUa https://t.co/m
RT @TheBenSchmark: @kevinnbass @OttawaHospital Thanks Kevin. Can you please also widely share what Cochrane, the most respected evidence an…
@kevinnbass @OttawaHospital Thanks Kevin. Can you please also widely share what Cochrane, the most respected evidence analysis organization in the world found about Covid-19 vaccines? 🙏 https://t.co/hq5qY70ZWo https://t.co/W74NPbS9Nh
@Pablosquest @ICNARC You asked 'why *are* people not warned', not why we they not warned... ...we now have a much clearer idea of the risk:benefit ratio of the vaccines [ref: https://t.co/WYjDrL3Vw9] https://t.co/HDqkzMCOMD
@jason_willz1 @contrarian4data @jsm2334 There was, of course, reduction in risk of infection, despite desperate attempts by vaccine denialists to pretend otherwise by committing the nirvana fallacy. https://t.co/lCLE7vH7AH https://t.co/tiqKNHvyN6 https://
@KaspariDirk @emilthedk @rki_de Das Auslesen von mRNA und das Herstellen von Proteinen geschieht permanent jede Sekunde im Körper. Sehr viele RCTs, hier vom Cochrane Institut überprüft https://t.co/ouM299BG5Z Warum leugnen Sie dies?
@GidMK Any slim chance of fast eradication died when vaccines were not spread globally equitably. It's too widespread in too many nations, with an R greater than endemic influenza. Only real hope of eradication would be an improved vaccine. https://t.co/
@Plandemie19 @DantonLuc69 @THEVENONPierri1 @celine_pina Etudes sur l'efficacité des vaccins : https://t.co/3lOJqwjujT
@drsimonegold Here's another gold standard review from the same institution concluding that covid vaccines work and are safe https://t.co/VGZSt99L6d
@LeafsRag @MathewCitM @gorskon @19joho @DiedSuddenly_ I'll leave you to your tone trolling, JAQing off, evidence-free conspiracism, non-expert vaccine denialism, etc., since you're clearly a lost cause. Some minds are too warped by paranoia to be helped.
@JohnKlapper6 @Observer_de @PiratOfRibbeck Klar doch, Schwurbler ausser diesen: "We included and analyzed 41 RCTs assessing 12 different vaccines, including homologous and heterologous vaccine schedules and the effect of booster doses. Thirty‐two RCTs were
RT @EricHesotte: @Dr_Steph_GAYET Vous pourrez réaffirmer, persister et signer avec le plus grand aplomb du monde jusqu'à la fin de vos jour…
RT @EricHesotte: @Dr_Steph_GAYET Vous pourrez réaffirmer, persister et signer avec le plus grand aplomb du monde jusqu'à la fin de vos jour…
@MedRest1 @pottrix @TheKnoll67 @JasonKerrison @rosey_nz 4) You might want to read the Cochrane report you referenced. It is only based on data up to November 2021. "Most received co-funding from academic institutions and pharmaceutical companies. Most stud
@rt7683 @1kimmar @real_seeking @jason_willz1 Anyway, meta-analyses of RCTs show vaccines work, unlike for ivermectin. https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/vQofadiEi4 https://t.co/N3XR6daOuw
@pottrix @TheKnoll67 @JasonKerrison @rosey_nz Not sure what you want exactly but I've already posted 2 risk benefit analyses, 1 article and a Cochrane Review. https://t.co/VhHAxirYCB https://t.co/XqzAPrKy4t https://t.co/cWpfRZVKMm https://t.co/FX3cTUyny9
@JiriParkes1 Ano, brání. Nikoliv příběhy z FB v e stylu "jedna paní povídala", což je chybné vyvození "argument anekdotou", ale pečlivá statistická analýza dat statisíců nemocných. Viz odkaz - Cochrane je zlatý standard pro metaanalýzy a systematické přehl
RT @EricHesotte: @Dr_Steph_GAYET Vous pourrez réaffirmer, persister et signer avec le plus grand aplomb du monde jusqu'à la fin de vos jour…
@Dr_Steph_GAYET Vous pourrez réaffirmer, persister et signer avec le plus grand aplomb du monde jusqu'à la fin de vos jours, vous n'aurez jamais raison à contredire frontalement et sans preuves tous les résultats des meilleures sources scientifiques intern
@maxchambord @Dr_Steph_GAYET Aucune, juste son impression. Et elle contredit frontalement toutes les conclusions issues des Cochrane, Science, Nature etc. Bref, de la pure obsession paranoïaque délirante 🤡 https://t.co/ftKef7AfQU
@ptpmptplt @underbr1dge201 @studiocorvo 重症化や死亡を防いでいることは科学的に複数の論文で証明されています。 違うというなら論文を読んだ上で反証してください。 利害関係は論文に記載されているので金で書かれた云々はそれを読んだ上で指摘しましょう。 https://t.co/BUOEK8tBxx
@kota_sugihara Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines - PubMed https://t.co/WOdaHIi711 Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials - PMC https://t.co/2qEZ8BenSi
@aug02msy @key_sukekun @JAPAN_lineage @shippo22nikukyu @dNrIXZLnZu1b1xx @pittatopantsu @TJB7777777 @studiocorvo @matatabidayon とりあえずコクランレビューに反論してもらいましょうか? https://t.co/BUOEK8tBxx
@santoslhalper71 @Oakley_535 @GweedoToudry @jwoodz56 @humane_uhama @davemadue_ @DailyLoud It’s how just about every vaccine works. Have you read about the COVID vaccine or any vaccine in any depth from a source not riddled with anti-science right wing rage
@APGlwHEXm6CUjLA 海外データでなにが問題なの? コクランレビューを貼っておくわ。 それとワクチンによって致死率が下がったことが明確なデータの何が問題なの? 反ワク情報ソースよりはマトモですけど? https://t.co/BUOEK8tBxx
@matatabidayon @TJB7777777 @shippo22nikukyu @aug02msy @dNrIXZLnZu1b1xx @pittatopantsu @PeteMitchell_tg @studiocorvo @key_sukekun @JAPAN_lineage 根拠論文はおいておくから日本で30万人以上助かったというのは自分で計算してね。 https://t.co/Q6AdbXMbtv
@TJB7777777 @key_sukekun @shippo22nikukyu @aug02msy @dNrIXZLnZu1b1xx @pittatopantsu @PeteMitchell_tg @studiocorvo @matatabidayon @JAPAN_lineage マジでバカバカしいからコクランレビューの論文リンクしておくね。 必要な論文はコクランレビューの先にあるから読んでね。 30万人以上助かったというのはワクチンの無い時代の致死率とオミクロン以降の罹患者数から自分で計算してね。
@SHomburg Ich hab nur diese Analysen gefunden von Cochrane die haben RCT Studie untersucht, aber der Zeitraum erstreckt sich nur bis zum 5. November 2021. https://t.co/9EAnRcxJa0
@KristyWker @Un_EtreHumain Si c'était le cas non bien sûr. Mais ce n'est qu'une fausse croyance heureusement. La vaccination sauve des vies et il est inadmissible et criminel de faire peur aux gens sans raisons sérieuses. https://t.co/h5Hlnq55vg https://t.
@CirceLover @RegularClaw @19joho Did you learn to not commit the nirvana fallacy? https://t.co/lCLE7vH7AH https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/AnUsuK5kxi
@LADYBUNNY77 @19joho @mehdirhasan You're committing the nirvana fallacy https://t.co/lCLE7vH7AH https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/LSzEMKNvtW
@komradeperogie @GidMK Ah, that way Twitter can be left to non-expert misinformers + conspiracy theorists like you, happy in your willful ignorance on the topics you discuss. https://t.co/koTcXyFPD8 https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/0buq7z3fUu
@TheCryptonaut2 @jonathanstea Re: "That's a well known fact" Yet you cite no evidence for it, non-expert contrarian. Go do some reading, instead of abusing the nirvana fallacy. https://t.co/tiqKNHvyN6 https://t.co/NatzR15kLg https://t.co/dmp742zvc1 http
@MNHR_Labo 世界最高のエビデンス集団が主要なコロナワクチンは安全で有効としてるな しかもマスクと違って一部を除き確度が高い 何でこっち信じないでワクチンの真実とかやってるの? https://t.co/sSoQItKP6e
@RadicalLabGeek @jg091297 @jonathanstea @NewsRover It's the nirvana fallacy'. Vaccine denialists use it for every vaccine that comes along, so it's no surprise to see it reappear for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/tiqKNHw6CE https://t.co/NatzR15S
@DrGipps @jonathanstea Would really be nice if non-expert contrarians stopped abusing decades-old vaccine denialist tropes like the nirvana fallacy. https://t.co/tiqKNHw6CE https://t.co/NatzR15SAO https://t.co/dmp742A31z https://t.co/lCLE7vHFqf https://t
@imtweetn @jonathanstea @darkwingdutch You haven't said anything of value, and likely never will. All you can do is sit around pretending that making up evidence-free garbage about a study is being scientific, when it isn't. You're just a troll. 🙄 https:
@Opportunitweet @jonathanstea Take the L, non-expert contrarian ideologue. https://t.co/NatzR15kLg https://t.co/dmp742zvc1 https://t.co/jvBw6QdH0W https://t.co/dPNEqJgyW1
@giannmi @jakesyma @stuffynz @Macj007C @isabelltemple @doritmi @tickerguy @C19VaxInjured @YouTube @mehdirhasan @RemindMe_OfThis @remindmetweets @WSJ So you also agree with their conclusion that the vaccines are effective and have little to no serious adver
@3rT6fLB6cuZW3OJ @ichigumapanda あら科学的には効果があるというエビデンスが山ほどあるのよ。 それと官僚の怠慢は理由にならないし、反ワク御用達の理屈でしかないわよww https://t.co/9NNTO0lTNd
@KrugAlli @TracyBethHoeg @JAMANetworkOpen Also telling that Høeg cited Cochrane when she thinks what they publish suits her contrarian narrative, but conveniently doesn't mention them otherwise. For example: on vaccine effectiveness. https://t.co/NatzR15
@TomaszKaczanow1 @michallembryk @Marcelii10 @hazan @TruePomezZ Tu masz z tego samego zbioru o szczepionkach na covid 19 https://t.co/BHNbhhG0i8 tamto co wstawiles to jakies badania na zwykłą grypę z 2016 roku
@Tedlinknews @MichaeljSpence8 @DecodingFoxNews Your correlation chart is far from convincing. However, I bring the receipts: a Cochrane peer-review summary. https://t.co/Fztyegw4Pi
@daneelwiggins @USMortality Independent RCT's say otherwise :) https://t.co/YGD4j6VWJk
@FreundWillis @MBoegelein @Rema59833910 @DrPuerner Kleine Kohorte, keine Aussagekraft. Deshalb gibt es Meta-Studien. Große Cochrane Meta-Studie zur Corona-Impfung: Impfen schützt effektiv vor schwerer Erkrankung und Tod. Es gibt nur wenig Gefahr von ernste
@elgatomimo @ferpamanz @lourdesgs1980 @Farmaenfurecida No, no está claro. Lo único que hay es una paranoia muy bien dirigida por gente interesada. Afectados que de haberlos (y confirmar que es por la vacuna y no por otra cosa) son un a minoría en comparaci
RT @zOjzQ8sS9mqZ5yQ: ?これが集団免疫のデータなんですか? ギャグですよねw
RT @Volksverpetzer: Hier haben wir noch eine große Meta-Studie, die zeigt, wie sicher und wirksam die Impfungen sind. Von #Cochrane übrigen…
?これが集団免疫のデータなんですか? ギャグですよねw