↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002026.pub2
Authors

Bertrand Baujat, Jean Bourhis, Pierre Blanchard, Jens Overgaard, Kian K Ang, Michelle Saunders, Aurélie Le Maître, Jacques Bernier, Jean Claude Horiot, Emilie Maillard, Thomas F Pajak, Michael G Poulsen, Abderrahmane Bourredjem, Brian O'Sullivan, Werner Dobrowsky, Hliniak Andrzej, Krzystof Skladowski, John H Hay, Luiz HJ Pinto, Karen K Fu, Carlo Fallai, Richard Sylvester, Jean Pierre Pignon

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Other 14 9%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 41 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,643,010
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,147
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,908
of 180,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.