| Title |
Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002026.pub2 |
| Authors |
Bertrand Baujat, Jean Bourhis, Pierre Blanchard, Jens Overgaard, Kian K Ang, Michelle Saunders, Aurélie Le Maître, Jacques Bernier, Jean Claude Horiot, Emilie Maillard, Thomas F Pajak, Michael G Poulsen, Abderrahmane Bourredjem, Brian O'Sullivan, Werner Dobrowsky, Hliniak Andrzej, Krzystof Skladowski, John H Hay, Luiz HJ Pinto, Karen K Fu, Carlo Fallai, Richard Sylvester, Jean Pierre Pignon |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,643,010
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,147
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,908
of 180,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.