Title |
Acupuncture for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005111.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric Manheimer, Ke Cheng, L. Susan Wieland, Li Shih Min, Xueyong Shen, Brian M Berman, Lixing Lao |
Abstract |
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common, costly, and difficult to treat disorder that impairs health-related quality of life and work productivity. Evidence-based treatment guidelines have been unable to provide guidance on the effects of acupuncture for IBS because the only previous systematic review included only small, heterogeneous and methodologically unsound trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
United States | 4 | 12% |
Spain | 3 | 9% |
Ireland | 2 | 6% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 88% |
Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 289 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 59 | 20% |
Student > Master | 40 | 13% |
Researcher | 37 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
Other | 47 | 16% |
Unknown | 79 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 12% |
Psychology | 17 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
Other | 39 | 13% |
Unknown | 88 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#704,898
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,312
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,344
of 176,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.