The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005562.pub3 |
Authors |
Bob Woods, Harleen Kaur, Emma Elliott, Elisa Aguirre, Martin Orrell, Aimee Spector |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 10% |
Chile | 4 | 5% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 62 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 58 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 15% |
Scientists | 9 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 467 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 67 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 12% |
Researcher | 41 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 5% |
Other | 98 | 21% |
Unknown | 151 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 16% |
Psychology | 75 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 19 | 4% |
Other | 71 | 15% |
Unknown | 168 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#623,861
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,046
of 13,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,338
of 492,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.