| Title |
Convalescent plasma for people with COVID‐19: a living systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013600.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Iannizzi, Khai Li Chai, Vanessa Piechotta, Sarah J Valk, Catherine Kimber, Ina Monsef, Erica M Wood, Abigail A Lamikanra, David J Roberts, Zoe McQuilten, Cynthia So-Osman, Aikaj Jindal, Nora Cryns, Lise J Estcourt, Nina Kreuzberger, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 3 | 10% |
| Germany | 3 | 10% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,995,717
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,145
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,726
of 477,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.