↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
41 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
Title
Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009607.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean Beggs, Yi Chao Foong, Hong Cecilia T Le, Danial Noor, Richard Wood‐Baker, Julia AE Walters

Abstract

Asthma is the most common chronic medical condition in children and a common reason for hospitalisation. Observational studies have suggested that swimming, in particular, is an ideal form of physical activity to improve fitness and decrease the burden of disease in asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 391 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 17%
Student > Bachelor 56 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 10%
Researcher 28 7%
Other 21 5%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 127 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 14%
Sports and Recreations 30 8%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 144 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#774,596
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,450
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,489
of 204,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.