↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus current best practice (including inhaled steroid maintenance), for chronic asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus current best practice (including inhaled steroid maintenance), for chronic asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007313.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Cates, Charlotta Karner

Abstract

Traditionally inhaled treatment for asthma has used separate preventer and reliever therapies. The combination of formoterol and budesonide in one inhaler has made possible a single inhaler for both prevention and relief of symptoms (single inhaler therapy or SiT).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 239 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 11%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 96 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Psychology 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 105 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,495,371
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,847
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,265
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.