The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003543.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davey, Peter, Brown, Erwin, Charani, Esmita, Fenelon, Lynda, Gould, Ian M, Holmes, Alison, Ramsay, Craig R, Wiffen, Philip J, Wilcox, Mark |
| Abstract |
The first publication of this review in Issue 3, 2005 included studies up to November 2003. This update adds studies to December 2006 and focuses on application of a new method for meta-analysis of interrupted time series studies and application of new Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Risk of Bias criteria to all studies in the review, including those studies in the previously published version. The aim of the review is to evaluate the impact of interventions from the perspective of antibiotic stewardship. The two objectives of antibiotic stewardship are first to ensure effective treatment for patients with bacterial infection and second support professionals and patients to reduce unnecessary use and minimize collateral damage. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 14 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 29% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 486 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 2% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 2% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 3% |
| Unknown | 435 | 90% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 3% |
| Unknown | 437 | 90% |