↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012648.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Zamora-de La Cruz, John Bartlett, Mario Gutierrez, Sueko M Ng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Other 3 7%
Unspecified 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 21 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 21 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,285,103
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,616
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,939
of 485,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.