↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
397 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006132.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather Waterman, Jennifer R Evans, Trish A Gray, David Henson, Robert Harper

Abstract

Poor adherence to therapy is a significant healthcare issue, particularly in patients with chronic disease such as open-angle glaucoma. Treatment failure may necessitate unwarranted changes of medications, increased healthcare expenditure and risk to the patient if surgical intervention is required. Simplifying eye drop regimes, providing adequate information, teaching drop instillation technique and ongoing support according to the patient need may have a positive effect on improving adherence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 390 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 12%
Researcher 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Student > Postgraduate 32 8%
Other 75 19%
Unknown 109 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 13%
Psychology 21 5%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 124 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,515,973
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,370
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,386
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.