Title |
Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006132.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heather Waterman, Jennifer R Evans, Trish A Gray, David Henson, Robert Harper |
Abstract |
Poor adherence to therapy is a significant healthcare issue, particularly in patients with chronic disease such as open-angle glaucoma. Treatment failure may necessitate unwarranted changes of medications, increased healthcare expenditure and risk to the patient if surgical intervention is required. Simplifying eye drop regimes, providing adequate information, teaching drop instillation technique and ongoing support according to the patient need may have a positive effect on improving adherence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 390 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 55 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 12% |
Researcher | 45 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 8% |
Other | 75 | 19% |
Unknown | 109 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 13% |
Psychology | 21 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 3% |
Other | 39 | 10% |
Unknown | 124 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,515,973
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,370
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,386
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.