↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for early breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for early breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005212.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brigid E Hickey, Daniel P Francis, Margot Lehman

Abstract

After surgery for localised breast cancer, radiotherapy (RT) improves both local control and breast cancer-specific survival. In patients at risk of harbouring micro-metastatic disease, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) improves 15-year survival. However, the best sequence of administering these two types of adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 47 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 49 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2013.
All research outputs
#13,036,075
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,917
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,579
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#206
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.