↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prognostic factors for the development and progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in people with diabetic retinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic factors for the development and progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in people with diabetic retinopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013775.pub2
Authors

Jennifer Perais, Ridhi Agarwal, Jennifer R Evans, Emma Loveman, Jill L Colquitt, David Owens, Ruth E Hogg, John G Lawrenson, Yemisi Takwoingi, Noemi Lois

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 29 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 31 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,116,573
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,893
of 12,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,630
of 410,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.