| Title |
Intermittent phototherapy versus continuous phototherapy for neonatal jaundice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008168.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sasi Bhushan Gottimukkala, Lisha Lobo, Kanekal S Gautham, Srinivas Bolisetty, Michelle Fiander, Tim Schindler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Peru | 1 | 7% |
| Nepal | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,386,624
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,935
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,899
of 423,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.