| Title |
Trunk training following stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013712.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liselot Thijs, Eline Voets, Stijn Denissen, Jan Mehrholz, Bernhard Elsner, Robin Lemmens, Geert SAF Verheyden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 85% |
| Scientists | 8 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#686,450
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,310
of 12,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,953
of 409,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.