| Title |
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006203.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flavia M Belmonte, Cristiane R Macedo, Peter F Day, Humberto Saconato, Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani |
| Abstract |
Dental trauma is common especially in children and young adults. One group of dento-alveolar injuries is classified as luxation. This group includes a subgroup of severe injuries where the tooth is displaced from its original position. These injuries are classified further by the direction in which the tooth has been displaced, namely: intrusion, extrusion and lateral luxation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 24% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Malta | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 32% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 78 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 86 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,713,145
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,687
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,612
of 204,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.