↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006203.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavia M Belmonte, Cristiane R Macedo, Peter F Day, Humberto Saconato, Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani

Abstract

Dental trauma is common especially in children and young adults. One group of dento-alveolar injuries is classified as luxation. This group includes a subgroup of severe injuries where the tooth is displaced from its original position. These injuries are classified further by the direction in which the tooth has been displaced, namely: intrusion, extrusion and lateral luxation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 23%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 52 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 60 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,358,100
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,125
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,592
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.