| Title |
Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013766.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Dawson, Carla-Jane Girling, Lisa Cowap, David Clark-Carter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 18 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,483,081
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,738
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,438
of 424,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.