↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013766.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Dawson, Carla-Jane Girling, Lisa Cowap, David Clark-Carter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,606,362
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,542
of 12,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,626
of 271,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.