| Title |
Pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013815.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aidan G Cashin, Benedict M Wand, Neil E O'Connell, Hopin Lee, Rodrigo Rn Rizzo, Matthew K Bagg, Edel O'Hagan, Christopher G Maher, Andrea D Furlan, Maurits W van Tulder, James H McAuley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 219 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 14% |
| Australia | 21 | 10% |
| United States | 19 | 9% |
| Spain | 13 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 74 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 157 | 72% |
| Scientists | 40 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#252,518
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#407
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,067
of 426,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.