↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006964.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laureen M Lopez, Markus Steiner, David A Grimes, Deborah Hilgenberg, Kenneth F Schulz

Abstract

Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness is crucial to making an informed choice. The consumer has to comprehend the pros and cons of the contraceptive methods being considered. Choice may be influenced by understanding the likelihood of pregnancy with each method and factors that influence effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 258 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 19%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Other 13 5%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 85 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Psychology 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 95 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,351,840
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,863
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,853
of 204,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#236
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.