↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus medical treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus medical treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003951.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manoj N Malviya, Arne Ohlsson, Sachin S Shah

Abstract

A patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with significant left to right shunt increases morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Early closure of the ductus arteriosus may be achieved pharmacologically or by surgery. The preferred initial treatment of a symptomatic PDA, surgical ligation or treatment with indomethacin, is not clear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 264 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 71 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 79 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,771,861
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,406
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,510
of 210,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.