The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonists for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015849 |
Authors |
Patrizia Natale, Suetonia C Palmer, David J Tunnicliffe, Tadashi Toyama, Giovanni FM Strippoli |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,040,534
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,249
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,071
of 422,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.