↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012463
Authors

Janya McCalman, Sandra K Campbell, Catherine Chamberlain, Natalie A Strobel, Roxanne G Bainbridge, Mark Wenitong, Alan Ruben, Karen M Edmond, Rhonda Marriott, Komla Tsey, Katrina Keith, Linda Shields

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 19%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Psychology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,777,015
of 12,788,180 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,368
of 10,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,273
of 371,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,788,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.