↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating acute surgical and traumatic wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating acute surgical and traumatic wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008059.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eskes, Anne, Ubbink, Dirk T, Lubbers, Maarten, Lucas, Cees, Vermeulen, Hester

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is used as a treatment for acute wounds (such as those arising from surgery and trauma) however the effects of HBOT on wound healing are unclear. 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 4 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,396,530
of 15,555,501 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,055
of 11,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,441
of 156,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,555,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.