↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different functional treatment strategies for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Different functional treatment strategies for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerkhoffs, G M M J, Struijs, P A A, Marti, R K, Assendelft, W J J, Blankevoort, L, van Dijk, C N, Gino MMJ Kerkhoffs, Peter AA Struijs, Rene K Marti, Willem JJ Assendelft, Leendert Blankevoort, C N van Dijk

Abstract

Acute lateral ankle ligament ruptures are common problems in present health care. Early mobilisation and functional treatment are advocated as a preferable treatment strategy. However, functional treatment comprises a broad spectrum of treatment strategies and as of yet no optimal strategy has been identified.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 36%
Other 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 18%
Sports and Recreations 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,193,180
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,989
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,405
of 122,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.