| Title |
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003807.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Tim OB Eden |
| Abstract |
Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent and treat them. One of these side effects is oral candidiasis. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 58 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,972,948
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,346
of 12,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,965
of 162,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.