↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003807.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Tim OB Eden

Abstract

Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent and treat them. One of these side effects is oral candidiasis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Postgraduate 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 27 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,164,751
of 15,069,742 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,274
of 11,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,344
of 156,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,069,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.