The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Exercise treatments for chronic low back pain: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015608 |
| Authors |
Jill A Hayden, Rachel Ogilvie, Shazia Kashif, Sareen Singh, Leah Boulos, Samuel A Stewart, L Susan Wieland, Fabianna R Jesus-Moraleida, Bruno T Saragiotto, Tiê P Yamato, Annemarie de Zoete, Kasper Bülow, Lisandra Almeida de Oliveira, Geronimo Bejarano, Carolina Cancelliere |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,052,529
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,650
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,796
of 396,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.