The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014796 |
Authors |
Isolde Sommer, Julia Harlfinger, Christina Kien, Irma Klerings, Lisa Affengruber, Andreea Dobrescu, Ursula Griebler |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 21% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,853,334
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,364
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,431
of 452,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.