Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
Gianni Virgili, Katie Curran, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Tunde Peto, Mariacristina Parravano
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of||1||8%|
|Members of the public||9||69%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||31%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||12%|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||8%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||15%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||8%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||4%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 347,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.