↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Embed badge What is this page?

Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
529 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Policy documents Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
Title
Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009189.pub2
Pubmed ID
23728687
Authors

Sarah Gentry, Michelle HMMT van-Velthoven, Lorainne Tudor Car, Josip Car

Abstract

This is one of three Cochrane reviews examining the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Telephone interventions, delivered either by landline or mobile phone, may be useful in the management of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in many situations. Telephone delivered interventions have the potential to reduce costs, save time and facilitate more support for PLHIV.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 518 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 19%
Researcher 74 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 11%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Student > Postgraduate 31 6%
Other 100 19%
Unknown 113 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 14%
Psychology 62 12%
Social Sciences 43 8%
Computer Science 14 3%
Other 68 13%
Unknown 128 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,041,774
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,501
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,081
of 194,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.