↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
480 Mendeley
Title
Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009189.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Gentry, Michelle HMMT van-Velthoven, Lorainne Tudor Car, Josip Car

Abstract

This is one of three Cochrane reviews examining the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Telephone interventions, delivered either by landline or mobile phone, may be useful in the management of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in many situations. Telephone delivered interventions have the potential to reduce costs, save time and facilitate more support for PLHIV.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 468 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 20%
Researcher 68 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 12%
Student > Bachelor 48 10%
Student > Postgraduate 31 6%
Other 84 18%
Unknown 93 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 140 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 14%
Psychology 57 12%
Social Sciences 44 9%
Computer Science 12 3%
Other 54 11%
Unknown 107 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,881,580
of 16,441,477 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,629
of 11,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,122
of 158,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,441,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.