↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Embed badge What is this page?

Telephone delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV-negative persons

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
557 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Telephone delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV-negative persons
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009190.pub2
Pubmed ID
23728688
Authors

Michelle HMMT van-Velthoven, Lorainne Tudor Car, Sarah Gentry, Josip Car

Abstract

This is one of the three Cochrane reviews that examine the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Although HIV infection can be prevented, still a large number of new infections occur. More effective HIV prevention interventions are needed to reduce the number of people newly infected with HIV. Phone calls can be used to potentially more effectively deliver HIV prevention interventions. They have the potential to save time, reduce costs and facilitate easier access.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 545 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 18%
Researcher 82 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 6%
Other 93 17%
Unknown 128 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 13%
Psychology 60 11%
Social Sciences 53 10%
Computer Science 15 3%
Other 62 11%
Unknown 145 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,340,012
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,426
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,813
of 194,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#256
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.