↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telephone delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV‐negative persons

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
624 Mendeley
Title
Telephone delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV‐negative persons
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009190.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle HMMT van‐Velthoven, Lorainne Tudor Car, Sarah Gentry, Josip Car

Abstract

This is one of the three Cochrane reviews that examine the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Although HIV infection can be prevented, still a large number of new infections occur. More effective HIV prevention interventions are needed to reduce the number of people newly infected with HIV. Phone calls can be used to potentially more effectively deliver HIV prevention interventions. They have the potential to save time, reduce costs and facilitate easier access.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 624 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 612 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 14%
Researcher 83 13%
Student > Bachelor 44 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 6%
Other 103 17%
Unknown 170 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 76 12%
Psychology 62 10%
Social Sciences 58 9%
Computer Science 15 2%
Other 68 11%
Unknown 188 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,723,600
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,357
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#264
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.