| Title |
Telephone delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV‐negative persons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009190.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle HMMT van‐Velthoven, Lorainne Tudor Car, Sarah Gentry, Josip Car |
| Abstract |
This is one of the three Cochrane reviews that examine the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Although HIV infection can be prevented, still a large number of new infections occur. More effective HIV prevention interventions are needed to reduce the number of people newly infected with HIV. Phone calls can be used to potentially more effectively deliver HIV prevention interventions. They have the potential to save time, reduce costs and facilitate easier access. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 609 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 597 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 102 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 14% |
| Researcher | 82 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 105 | 17% |
| Unknown | 156 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 76 | 12% |
| Psychology | 62 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 56 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 69 | 11% |
| Unknown | 174 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,723,600
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,357
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#264
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.