The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Face to face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010038.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Kaufman, Anneliese Synnot, Rebecca Ryan, Sophie Hill, Dell Horey, Natalie Willis, Vivian Lin, Priscilla Robinson |
| Abstract |
Childhood vaccination (also described as immunisation) is an important and effective way to reduce childhood illness and death. However, there are many children who do not receive the recommended vaccines because their parents do not know why vaccination is important, do not understand how, where or when to get their children vaccinated, disagree with vaccination as a public health measure, or have concerns about vaccine safety.Face to face interventions to inform or educate parents about routine childhood vaccination may improve vaccination rates and parental knowledge or understanding of vaccination. Such interventions may describe or explain the practical and logistical factors associated with vaccination, and enable parents to understand the meaning and relevance of vaccination for their family or community. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 435 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 18% |
| Researcher | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 116 | 26% |
| Unknown | 71 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 142 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 9% |
| Psychology | 32 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 14% |
| Unknown | 88 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#747,354
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,391
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,534
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.