↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001291.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V Carson, Malcolm P Brinn, Nadina A Labiszewski, Adrian J Esterman, Anne B Chang, Brian J Smith

Abstract

Cigarette smoking is one of the leading causes of preventable death in the world. Decisions to smoke are often made within a broad social context and therefore community interventions using coordinated, multi-component programmes may be effective in influencing the smoking behaviour of young people.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 401 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 18%
Student > Master 67 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 14%
Student > Postgraduate 31 8%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Other 82 20%
Unknown 70 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 31%
Social Sciences 58 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 11%
Psychology 46 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 88 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,037,543
of 18,679,273 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,611
of 11,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,799
of 168,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,679,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.