| Title |
Low glycaemic index diets for coronary heart disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004467.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly S, Frost G, Whittaker V, Summerbell C |
| Abstract |
The glycaemic index (GI) is a physiological measure of the ability of a carbohydrate to affect blood glucose. Interest is growing in the low GI carbohydrate concept for the clinical management of people at risk of, or with established coronary heart disease. There is a need to review the current evidence from controlled trials in this area. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,392,477
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,211
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,863
of 62,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.