↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Low glycaemic index diets for coronary heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Summary Policy documents Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Low glycaemic index diets for coronary heart disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004467.pub2
Pubmed ID
15495112
Authors

Kelly S, Frost G, Whittaker V, Summerbell C

Abstract

The glycaemic index (GI) is a physiological measure of the ability of a carbohydrate to affect blood glucose. Interest is growing in the low GI carbohydrate concept for the clinical management of people at risk of, or with established coronary heart disease. There is a need to review the current evidence from controlled trials in this area.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Other 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 28 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,392,477
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,211
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,863
of 62,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.