↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Music interventions for preoperative anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
812 Mendeley
Title
Music interventions for preoperative anxiety
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006908.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joke Bradt, Cheryl Dileo, Minjung Shim

Abstract

Patients awaiting surgical procedures often experience significant anxiety. Such anxiety may result in negative physiological manifestations, slower wound healing, increased risk of infection, and may complicate the induction of anaesthesia and impede postoperative recovery. To reduce patient anxiety, sedatives and anti-anxiety drugs are regularly administered before surgery. However, these often have negative side effects and may prolong patient recovery. Therefore, increasing attention is being paid to a variety of non-pharmacological interventions for reduction of preoperative anxiety such as music therapy and music medicine interventions. Interventions are categorized as 'music medicine' when passive listening to pre-recorded music is offered by medical personnel. In contrast, music therapy requires the implementation of a music intervention by a trained music therapist, the presence of a therapeutic process, and the use of personally tailored music experiences. A systematic review was needed to gauge the efficacy of both music therapy and music medicine interventions for reduction of preoperative anxiety.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 812 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 803 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 141 17%
Student > Master 105 13%
Researcher 68 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 8%
Other 55 7%
Other 175 22%
Unknown 202 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 232 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 106 13%
Psychology 80 10%
Social Sciences 31 4%
Arts and Humanities 23 3%
Other 112 14%
Unknown 228 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 234. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#141,416
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#255
of 12,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#874
of 199,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.