↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Music interventions for preoperative anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
650 Mendeley
Title
Music interventions for preoperative anxiety
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006908.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joke Bradt, Cheryl Dileo, Minjung Shim

Abstract

Patients awaiting surgical procedures often experience significant anxiety. Such anxiety may result in negative physiological manifestations, slower wound healing, increased risk of infection, and may complicate the induction of anaesthesia and impede postoperative recovery. To reduce patient anxiety, sedatives and anti-anxiety drugs are regularly administered before surgery. However, these often have negative side effects and may prolong patient recovery. Therefore, increasing attention is being paid to a variety of non-pharmacological interventions for reduction of preoperative anxiety such as music therapy and music medicine interventions. Interventions are categorized as 'music medicine' when passive listening to pre-recorded music is offered by medical personnel. In contrast, music therapy requires the implementation of a music intervention by a trained music therapist, the presence of a therapeutic process, and the use of personally tailored music experiences. A systematic review was needed to gauge the efficacy of both music therapy and music medicine interventions for reduction of preoperative anxiety.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 650 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 641 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 123 19%
Student > Master 97 15%
Researcher 62 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 8%
Other 47 7%
Other 140 22%
Unknown 126 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 203 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 88 14%
Psychology 72 11%
Social Sciences 24 4%
Arts and Humanities 21 3%
Other 92 14%
Unknown 150 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#184,015
of 19,282,793 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#326
of 11,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,401
of 169,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,282,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.