↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Epidural analgesia for cardiac surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Epidural analgesia for cardiac surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006715.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vesna Svircevic, Martijn M Passier, Arno P Nierich, Diederik van Dijk, Cor J Kalkman, Geert J van der Heijden

Abstract

A combination of general anaesthesia (GA) with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) may have a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes by reducing the risk of perioperative complications after cardiac surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 32 31%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,477,424
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,615
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,922
of 148,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.