↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Preventive interventions for postnatal psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
17 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
Title
Preventive interventions for postnatal psychosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009991.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adib Essali, Samer Alabed, Aisha Guul, Norah Essali

Abstract

Postnatal psychosis is a worldwide life-threatening condition that affects one to two in every 1000 new mothers. It has an abrupt onset within a month of childbirth. Affected new mothers rapidly develop frank psychosis, cognitive impairment, and disorganised behaviours. Factors that increase the risk of postnatal psychosis include primiparous mothers who are single, women who are older, or with a past psychiatric history and family history of affective psychosis, prenatal depression and autoimmune thyroid dysfunction. The risk of a future postnatal recurrence is 25% to 57%. Preventive interventions for postnatal psychosis aim at identifying women with risk factors, early recognition of imminent psychosis through screening, and preventive drug therapy. Mood stabilisers, antipsychotic drugs and hormone therapy may be beneficial in the prevention of postnatal psychotic episodes in women at risk.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 333 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 11%
Researcher 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 10%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 84 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 24%
Psychology 80 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 93 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#606,032
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,190
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,631
of 199,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.