↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for post-stroke spasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
604 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for post-stroke spasticity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009689.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Demetrios, Fary Khan, Lynne Turner-Stokes, Caroline Brand, Shane McSweeney

Abstract

Spasticity may affect stroke survivors by contributing to activity limitations, caregiver burden, pain and reduced quality of life (QoL). Spasticity management guidelines recommend multidisciplinary (MD) rehabilitation programmes following botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatment for post-stroke spasticity. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of MD rehabilitation is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 596 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 125 21%
Student > Bachelor 65 11%
Researcher 64 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 10%
Other 38 6%
Other 124 21%
Unknown 130 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 116 19%
Neuroscience 36 6%
Social Sciences 32 5%
Psychology 28 5%
Other 71 12%
Unknown 151 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,751,484
of 22,037,553 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,440
of 12,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,797
of 176,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,037,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.