| Title |
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for post-stroke spasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009689.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marina Demetrios, Fary Khan, Lynne Turner-Stokes, Caroline Brand, Shane McSweeney |
| Abstract |
Spasticity may affect stroke survivors by contributing to activity limitations, caregiver burden, pain and reduced quality of life (QoL). Spasticity management guidelines recommend multidisciplinary (MD) rehabilitation programmes following botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatment for post-stroke spasticity. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of MD rehabilitation is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 46% |
| Chile | 2 | 15% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 653 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 128 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 11% |
| Researcher | 70 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 9% |
| Other | 40 | 6% |
| Other | 120 | 18% |
| Unknown | 170 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 178 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 118 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 39 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 5% |
| Psychology | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 72 | 11% |
| Unknown | 193 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,303,208
of 24,066,486 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,051
of 12,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,279
of 200,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,066,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.