↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for post‐stroke spasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
682 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for post‐stroke spasticity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009689.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Demetrios, Fary Khan, Lynne Turner‐Stokes, Caroline Brand, Shane McSweeney

Abstract

Spasticity may affect stroke survivors by contributing to activity limitations, caregiver burden, pain and reduced quality of life (QoL). Spasticity management guidelines recommend multidisciplinary (MD) rehabilitation programmes following botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatment for post-stroke spasticity. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of MD rehabilitation is unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 682 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 674 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 128 19%
Student > Bachelor 75 11%
Researcher 70 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 9%
Other 41 6%
Other 127 19%
Unknown 178 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 179 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 121 18%
Neuroscience 39 6%
Social Sciences 33 5%
Psychology 29 4%
Other 81 12%
Unknown 200 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,571,340
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,125
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,024
of 210,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.