↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical herbal interventions for gingivitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Topical herbal interventions for gingivitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010573
Authors

Matthew J Leach, Lisa Thoms

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#9,748,746
of 16,519,375 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,479
of 11,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,845
of 159,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,519,375 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.